Home Blog

Countries That Start With D: Complete List, Capitals, Facts and History

0

If you are looking for countries that start with D, the most commonly used modern English list contains five countries:

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Denmark
  • Djibouti
  • Dominica
  • Dominican Republic

There is, however, an interesting naming issue that makes this question less straightforward than it first appears.

The official United Nations Member States directory currently places six member states under the letter D. This is because it uses the formal English name Democratic People’s Republic of Korea for North Korea.

Other country databases may show only four countries under D because they alphabetize the Democratic Republic of the Congo under C, as in “Congo, Democratic Republic of the.”

Quick Answer: For general geography purposes, five countries are commonly listed as starting with D: Democratic Republic of the Congo, Denmark, Djibouti, Dominica, and the Dominican Republic. The UN Member States webpage lists six under D because it also includes the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea.

How Many Countries Start With D?

Using commonly displayed English country names, five sovereign countries start with D.

#CountryCapitalGeographic RegionISO Codes
1Democratic Republic of the CongoKinshasaMiddle AfricaCD / COD
2DenmarkCopenhagenNorthern EuropeDK / DNK
3DjiboutiDjiboutiEastern AfricaDJ / DJI
4DominicaRoseauCaribbeanDM / DMA
5Dominican RepublicSanto DomingoCaribbeanDO / DOM

The regional classifications and ISO codes can be verified through the United Nations Group of Experts on Geographical Names.

So, for the usual geography question “What countries start with D?”, the clearest answer is five.

Why Do Some Lists Say There Are 4, 5, or 6 Countries Starting With D?

The difference comes from country naming and alphabetization, rather than disagreement over which sovereign states exist.

NumberWhy You May See This Count
4The Democratic Republic of the Congo is alphabetized under C, while North Korea is listed under N or K.
5The Democratic Republic of the Congo is counted under D, while North Korea is listed by its commonly used name.
6Both the Democratic Republic of the Congo and the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea are alphabetized under D.

The United Nations Member States webpage currently places the following countries under D:

  • Democratic People’s Republic of Korea
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Denmark
  • Djibouti
  • Dominica
  • Dominican Republic

This produces a total of six under the UN alphabetical system.

Which Answer Should You Use?

For a general geography question such as “How many countries start with D?”, five is the most useful answer because it follows the common English naming convention in which North Korea is normally listed under N.

If the question specifically asks how many UN member states are displayed under D on the United Nations website, the answer is six.

1. Democratic Republic of the Congo

Democratic Republic of the Congo

The Democratic Republic of the Congo, commonly abbreviated as the DRC or DR Congo, is the largest country among the five commonly listed countries beginning with D.

Its capital is Kinshasa, and the United Nations classifies it within Middle Africa. Its ISO country codes are CD and COD. These details are recorded by the United Nations geographical names database.

The Democratic Republic of the Congo should not be confused with the neighboring Republic of the Congo, whose capital is Brazzaville. They are two separate sovereign countries.

A Brief History of the Democratic Republic of the Congo

The territory was formerly administered as the Belgian Congo and became independent from Belgium on June 30, 1960.

The country later became known as Zaire in 1971. In 1997, its name changed back to the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

This changing history of names also helps explain why the country appears under D in some alphabetical lists and under C in others.

Geography and Natural Heritage

The Democratic Republic of the Congo contains an enormous portion of the Congo Basin, one of the most important tropical forest regions on Earth.

UNESCO currently lists five World Heritage properties in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, all of which are natural sites. The current list can be verified on the UNESCO World Heritage Centre profile for the DRC.

UNESCO World Heritage SiteType
Virunga National ParkNatural
Garamba National ParkNatural
Kahuzi-Biega National ParkNatural
Salonga National ParkNatural
Okapi Wildlife ReserveNatural

2. Denmark

Denmark

Denmark is the only country in the common five-country D list located in Europe.

Its capital is Copenhagen. The United Nations classifies Denmark within Northern Europe, and its ISO codes are DK and DNK. These details are available from the United Nations geographical names database.

Denmark consists of the Jutland Peninsula and numerous islands. The wider Kingdom of Denmark also includes Greenland and the Faroe Islands.

A Brief History of Denmark

Human settlement in the area now known as Denmark stretches back thousands of years.

According to Denmarks official national website, people settled in the region following the last Ice Age, while farming communities developed thousands of years ago.

The period for which Denmark is perhaps best known internationally is the Viking Age. Danish Vikings participated in exploration, trade, settlement, and warfare across large areas of Europe and the North Atlantic world.

One of the most important surviving sites from early Danish history is Jelling.

The Jelling Mounds, Runic Stones and Church are recognized by UNESCO for their importance in illustrating the transition between Norse pagan traditions and Christianity during the tenth century.

Denmark and UNESCO

As of 2026, the UNESCO World Heritage Centre lists 13 World Heritage properties associated with Denmark.

These include Jelling, Kronborg Castle, Roskilde Cathedral, Ilulissat Icefjord, Stevns Klint, Viking-Age Ring Fortresses, Møns Klint, and sites in Greenland.

3. Djibouti

Djibouti

Djibouti is a country in the Horn of Africa whose capital shares the same name: Djibouti.

The United Nations classifies the country within Eastern Africa and records its formal English name as the Republic of Djibouti. Its ISO codes are DJ and DJI. These details can be checked through the United Nations geographical names database.

Why Djiboutis Location Matters

Djibouti occupies a strategically important position near the southern entrance to the Red Sea, close to the Gulf of Aden and major international maritime routes.

The World Bank describes Djibouti as a small country whose location and transport infrastructure give it an important role in regional trade and connectivity.

A Brief History of Djibouti

The territory of modern Djibouti was formerly under French administration and was known at different times as French Somaliland and the French Territory of the Afars and Issas.

Djibouti became independent from France on June 27, 1977.

It joined the United Nations on September 20, 1977, according to the UN Member States directory.

Djibouti and UNESCO

Djibouti does not currently have an inscribed UNESCO World Heritage property. However, the country has submitted several places to UNESCOs Tentative List.

These can be viewed on the UNESCO World Heritage Centre page for Djibouti.

Potential heritage areas include striking natural and cultural landscapes such as Lake Assal and Lake Abbeh.

4. Dominica

Dominica

Dominica is a Caribbean island country officially known as the Commonwealth of Dominica.

Its capital is Roseau.

The United Nations places Dominica within the Caribbean region of the Americas and assigns it the ISO codes DM and DMA. These details are available through the United Nations geographical names database.

Dominica lies between the French Caribbean islands of Guadeloupe and Martinique.

A Brief History of Dominica

Dominica became independent from the United Kingdom on November 3, 1978.

The Government of Dominicas official country profile records November 3, 1978 as the countrys independence date.

Dominica joined the United Nations on December 18, 1978.

Dominicas Volcanic Geography

Dominica stands out for its rugged volcanic landscape, tropical forests, mountains, rivers, waterfalls, hot springs, and geothermal features.

Its best-known protected area is Morne Trois Pitons National Park.

UNESCO inscribed the park on the World Heritage List in 1997. It protects volcanic peaks, tropical forest, lakes, rivers, waterfalls, fumaroles, hot springs, and the famous Boiling Lake.

5. Dominican Republic

Dominican Republic

The Dominican Republic is another Caribbean country beginning with D, but it should not be confused with Dominica.

Its capital is Santo Domingo.

The country occupies part of the island of Hispaniola, which it shares with Haiti. The United Nations classifies it within the Caribbean and assigns the country the ISO codes DO and DOM. These details are recorded by the United Nations geographical names database.

A Brief History of the Dominican Republic

The history of the Dominican Republic is closely connected with Santo Domingo, one of the earliest permanent European colonial settlements in the Americas.

According to UNESCO, Santo Domingo became home to several early Spanish colonial institutions in the Americas. The city was founded at the end of the fifteenth century, and its grid layout influenced later colonial cities across the Americas.

The modern Dominican Republic celebrates its national independence on February 27, 1844.

The Presidency of the Dominican Republic records February 27, 1844 as the day of national independence and the first raising of the Dominican flag.

Santo Domingo and UNESCO

The Colonial City of Santo Domingo was inscribed on the UNESCO World Heritage List in 1990.

UNESCO notes that its urban grid became an influential model for town planning elsewhere in the Americas. More information is available from the UNESCO World Heritage Centre.

Dominica vs Dominican Republic: Are They the Same Country?

No. Dominica and the Dominican Republic are completely separate sovereign countries.

The similarity in their names makes them easy to confuse, particularly in geography quizzes and alphabetical country lists.

FeatureDominicaDominican Republic
Official nameCommonwealth of DominicaDominican Republic
CapitalRoseauSanto Domingo
RegionCaribbeanCaribbean
IslandDominicaHispaniola
Shares island with another country?NoYes, Haiti
IndependenceNovember 3, 1978February 27, 1844
ISO codesDM / DMADO / DOM

Does North Korea Count as a Country That Starts With D?

It can, depending on which naming system is being used.

The commonly used English name is North Korea, which starts with N. Its formal English name, however, is the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, or DPRK.

The United Nations geographical names database uses Democratic People’s Republic of Korea and records the country within Eastern Asia.

That is why the UN Member States webpage places the country under the letter D.

The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea and the Republic of Korea both joined the United Nations on September 17, 1991.

Important distinction: If you use the familiar name North Korea, it belongs under N. If you use the formal UN name Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, it belongs under D.

Which Countries Starting With D Are in Africa?

Using the common five-country list, two countries beginning with D are in Africa:

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo, in Middle Africa
  • Djibouti, in Eastern Africa

The DRC is associated with the vast Congo Basin, while Djibouti lies in the Horn of Africa near the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden.

Which Country Starting With D Is in Europe?

Denmark is the only commonly listed country starting with D in Europe.

The United Nations geographical names database places Denmark in Northern Europe.

Which Countries Starting With D Are in the Caribbean?

There are two Caribbean countries that start with D:

  • Dominica
  • Dominican Republic

Although their names are similar, they are separate countries located on different islands.

Countries That Start With D by Region

RegionNumberCountries
Africa2Democratic Republic of the Congo, Djibouti
Europe1Denmark
Caribbean2Dominica, Dominican Republic
Asia0*None in the common five-country list

*The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea is in Eastern Asia and is included under D when its formal UN name is used.

Frequently Asked Questions About Countries That Start With D

What countries start with the letter D?

The five countries most commonly listed as starting with D are Democratic Republic of the Congo, Denmark, Djibouti, Dominica, and the Dominican Republic.

How many countries start with D?

The most common answer is five. However, the exact number can range from four to six depending on how country names are alphabetized. The United Nations Member States webpage currently displays six countries under D.

Why do some sources say only four countries start with D?

Some lists alphabetize the Democratic Republic of the Congo as Congo, Democratic Republic of the, which places it under C rather than D.

Does the Democratic Republic of the Congo start with D?

Yes. Written as Democratic Republic of the Congo, the country starts with D. Some databases rearrange the name for alphabetical purposes and place it under Congo.

Is Denmark the only European country that starts with D?

Yes. Among the commonly listed D countries, Denmark is the only country in Europe.

Is Djibouti a country?

Yes. Djibouti is a sovereign country in Eastern Africa and a member of the United Nations. It became independent from France in 1977.

Are Dominica and the Dominican Republic the same country?

No. Dominica and the Dominican Republic are two separate sovereign states. Dominicas capital is Roseau, while the capital of the Dominican Republic is Santo Domingo.

What is the largest country that starts with D?

Among the five commonly listed countries beginning with D, the Democratic Republic of the Congo is the largest by land area.

Does the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea start with D?

Yes. The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea is the formal English name of North Korea and begins with D. The United Nations therefore places it under D in its Member States directory.

Final Answer: Which Countries Start With D?

For most general geography purposes, there are five countries that start with D:

  1. Democratic Republic of the Congo
  2. Denmark
  3. Djibouti
  4. Dominica
  5. Dominican Republic

Together, these countries span Africa, Northern Europe, and the Caribbean. Their geography ranges from the forests of the Congo Basin and the strategic Red Sea location of Djibouti to Denmarks northern European landscape and the volcanic terrain of Dominica.

There is one important naming exception to remember. The United Nations lists six member states under D because it uses the formal name Democratic People’s Republic of Korea instead of North Korea.

Naming ConventionNumber of D Countries
Common English geography list5
DR Congo filed under Congo4
UN Member States directory including DPRK6

In one sentence: Five countries are commonly listed as starting with D, while the official UN Member States directory places six countries under D because it includes the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea.

Country classifications and factual information were reviewed against authoritative sources in September 2026.

Countries That Start With O: Complete List and Facts About Oman

0

If you are looking for countries that start with O, the answer is surprisingly simple: Oman is the only United Nations member state whose English short name begins with the letter O.

Oman, officially known as the Sultanate of Oman, is located on the southeastern side of the Arabian Peninsula in Western Asia. Its capital is Muscat.

According to the United Nations Group of Experts on Geographical Names, Oman is the country’s standardized English short name, while the Sultanate of Oman is its formal English name. The same UN database classifies Oman as part of Asia and Western Asia.

Quick Answer: There is only one country that starts with O: Oman. Its capital is Muscat, and it is located in Western Asia on the Arabian Peninsula.

How Many Countries Start With O?

There is one country that starts with O: Oman.

NumberCountryOfficial NameCapitalRegion
1OmanSultanate of OmanMuscatWestern Asia

The United Nations geographical names database lists Oman as a UN member in Asia, specifically Western Asia, and records its official English name as the Sultanate of Oman.

So, whether you are answering a geography quiz, completing a school assignment, solving a word game, or simply curious about world geography, the answer to “What country starts with O?” is:

Oman.

Quick Facts About Oman

Oman is much more than the only country beginning with O. Its location near important maritime routes has influenced its history, economy, culture, and relationships with other parts of Asia and Africa for thousands of years.

FactOman
Official nameSultanate of Oman
CapitalMuscat
ContinentAsia
RegionWestern Asia
Area309,500 square kilometers
Population5,442,883, September 2026
Official languageArabic
CurrencyOmani Rial
ISO Alpha-2 codeOM
ISO Alpha-3 codeOMN
Time zoneUTC +4
GovernmentHereditary monarchy
Head of stateSultan Haitham bin Tarik
UN membershipOctober 7, 1971

These figures are supported by the Foreign Ministry of the Sultanate of Oman, which lists the country’s official name, capital, population, area, language, government, currency, and time zone.

The United Nations geographical names database independently records Oman’s ISO codes as OM and OMN.

Where Is Oman?

Oman is located in the southeastern corner of the Arabian Peninsula in Western Asia.

It shares land borders with the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, and Yemen. Its extensive coastline faces the Sea of Oman and the Arabian Sea, connecting the country with important maritime routes in the Indian Ocean region.

According to the Oman Foreign Ministry, the country covers approximately 309,500 square kilometers and occupies a strategically important position in the southeastern Arabian Peninsula.

Oman also includes the Musandam Peninsula, which lies beside the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow maritime passage connecting the Gulf with the Sea of Oman.

What Does the Landscape of Oman Look Like?

Although Oman is often associated with deserts, its geography is surprisingly diverse.

The country contains:

  • Mountain ranges
  • Rocky desert landscapes
  • Sand dunes
  • Coastal plains
  • Wadis, or valleys and seasonal waterways
  • Long stretches of coastline
  • Oases
  • Seasonally green areas in southern Oman

The Hajar Mountains dominate parts of northern Oman, while western Oman reaches toward the Rub al Khali, or Empty Quarter, one of the world’s great desert regions. Oman’s official geography overview provides additional information about these landscapes and the country’s position on the Arabian Peninsula.

Why Is Oman the Only Country That Starts With O?

Why Is Oman the Only Country That Starts With O

There is no geographic rule determining which letters country names begin with. Modern country names developed through different languages, historical traditions, political changes, and systems of transliteration.

The United Nations Group of Experts on Geographical Names records the Arabic short name of Oman as عمان, romanized as ‘Umān, while the standardized English short name is Oman.

When internationally recognized countries are arranged alphabetically according to their English short names, Oman is therefore the only UN member state listed under the letter O.

A Brief History of Oman

The answer to “countries that start with O” may be short, but the history of Oman is remarkably long.

Archaeological evidence, ancient trade routes, maritime connections, fortified settlements, traditional irrigation systems, and historic ports all reveal Oman’s role in the development of societies around the Arabian Peninsula and Indian Ocean.

Ancient Oman

Human settlement in Oman stretches back thousands of years.

According to the official history of Oman published by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, archaeological research has found evidence of civilization in the region dating to around 3000 BCE. By approximately 2500 BCE, the region had become known for metalworking and long-distance trade.

UNESCO provides further evidence of Oman’s ancient past through the Archaeological Sites of Bat, Al-Khutm and Al-Ayn.

UNESCO describes the archaeological complex as one of the most complete and well-preserved collections of settlements and necropolises from the third millennium BCE.

Oman and the Frankincense Trade

Southern Oman became closely associated with the historic trade in frankincense, an aromatic resin that was highly valued in the ancient world.

Frankincense moved through extensive trade networks connecting Arabia with parts of Africa, the Mediterranean world, and Asia.

UNESCO recognizes this history through Oman’s Land of Frankincense World Heritage property. UNESCO explains that the archaeological sites represent the historic production and distribution of frankincense, which was an important luxury commodity in antiquity.

Oman as a Maritime Trading Power

Oman’s position on the Arabian Sea gave its communities direct access to maritime routes connecting the Arabian Peninsula with Africa, India, and Asia.

The Oman Foreign Ministry states that after Oman embraced Islam in the seventh century, its maritime trade routes extended south toward Africa and east toward India and China.

Another important example is the Ancient City of Qalhat, a UNESCO World Heritage Site on Oman’s eastern coast.

The historic settlement developed into an important trading center that connected Arabia with maritime commercial networks across the Indian Ocean.

Portuguese Control of Muscat

Oman’s strategic coastal position attracted competing regional and maritime powers.

According to the official history of Oman, Portugal seized Muscat in the 16th century and retained control of the city until 1650.

After Portuguese forces were expelled, Omani influence expanded along parts of the East African coast. Zanzibar later became particularly important within Oman’s political and commercial networks.

The Al Bu Said Dynasty

During the 18th century, Ahmad ibn Said emerged as an important Omani leader after Persian forces were driven from the country.

He established the Al Bu Said dynasty, which continues to rule Oman today. Oman’s official history identifies Ahmad ibn Said as the founder of the dynasty that still governs the Sultanate.

Modern Oman

A major turning point in modern Omani history occurred in 1970, when Sultan Qaboos bin Said became ruler.

During the following decades, Oman experienced major development in roads, education, healthcare, government services, communications, and other infrastructure.

Sultan Qaboos died in January 2020. Sultan Haitham bin Tarik succeeded him on January 11, 2020.

The Oman Foreign Ministry identifies Sultan Haitham bin Tarik as the current head of state and confirms that he is a member of the Al Bu Said dynasty.

When Did Oman Join the United Nations?

Oman became a member of the United Nations on October 7, 1971.

The United Nations Digital Library records General Assembly Resolution 2754 (XXVI), which admitted Oman to membership in the United Nations on that date.

Oman’s UNESCO World Heritage Sites

Oman’s long history is represented by several internationally recognized archaeological and cultural landscapes.

As of 2026, the UNESCO World Heritage Centre lists five World Heritage properties in Oman.

UNESCO World Heritage SiteYear Inscribed
Bahla Fort1987
Archaeological Sites of Bat, Al-Khutm and Al-Ayn1988
Land of Frankincense2000
Aflaj Irrigation Systems of Oman2006
Ancient City of Qalhat2018

The sites cover different periods of Omani history, from Bronze Age settlements and ancient trade to forts, irrigation technology, and Indian Ocean trading cities.

The Aflaj Irrigation Systems

One particularly important part of Oman’s cultural geography is its traditional aflaj irrigation system.

The UNESCO World Heritage Centre reports that more than 3,000 functioning aflaj remain in Oman. These systems collect and distribute water from groundwater, springs, or surface sources for agricultural and domestic use.

The systems demonstrate how communities adapted to the challenges of living and farming in an arid environment.

Are There Any Other Countries Beginning With O?

No. Oman is the only current UN member state whose English short name begins with the letter O.

Several well-known geographic names also begin with O, but they are not independent sovereign countries.

NameWhat Is It?LocationCountry?
OmanSovereign stateWestern AsiaYes
OceaniaGeographic regionPacific regionNo
OntarioProvinceCanadaNo
OregonStateUnited StatesNo
OkinawaPrefectureJapanNo
Orkney IslandsArchipelagoScotland, United KingdomNo

Is Oceania a Country That Starts With O?

No. Oceania is not a country.

Oceania is a geographic region encompassing Australia, New Zealand, Melanesia, Micronesia, Polynesia, and many islands of the Pacific.

It should therefore not be included in a list of sovereign countries beginning with O.

Oman remains the only country that starts with O.

What Continent Is the Country Starting With O In?

Oman is located in Asia, specifically Western Asia.

The United Nations geographical names database classifies Oman under the continent of Asia and the region of Western Asia.

ContinentCountries Starting With OCountry
Asia1Oman
Africa0None
Europe0None
North America0None
South America0None
Oceania0None

Frequently Asked Questions

What countries start with the letter O?

Oman is the only country that starts with the letter O among current United Nations member states.

How many countries start with O?

There is one country that starts with O: Oman.

What is the only country beginning with O?

The only country beginning with O is Oman, officially known as the Sultanate of Oman.

What is the capital of the country that starts with O?

Muscat is the capital of Oman. The Oman Foreign Ministry identifies Muscat as the country’s capital.

Is Oman in Asia or Africa?

Oman is in Asia, specifically Western Asia. Although Oman has extensive historical connections with East Africa, geographically the country lies on the Arabian Peninsula in Asia.

Is Oceania one of the countries that start with O?

No. Oceania is a geographic region, not an independent country. Oman is the only UN member state whose English short name begins with O.

What is Oman’s official name?

The country’s formal English name is the Sultanate of Oman. The United Nations uses Oman as its English short name.

When did Oman join the United Nations?

Oman was admitted to the United Nations on October 7, 1971, under UN General Assembly Resolution 2754 (XXVI).

Final Answer: Which Country Starts With O?

There is only one country that starts with O: Oman.

Officially called the Sultanate of Oman, the country is located in Western Asia on the southeastern Arabian Peninsula. Its capital is Muscat, its official language is Arabic, and its territory covers approximately 309,500 square kilometers.

Although the alphabetical answer is simple, Oman has a rich geographic and historical story. Archaeological settlements dating to the third millennium BCE, ancient frankincense routes, Indian Ocean trade, traditional irrigation systems, historic forts, and UNESCO World Heritage Sites all demonstrate the country’s long connection with Arabia and the wider world.

In one sentence: Oman is the only current United Nations member country whose English name starts with the letter O.

Countries With Multiple Capitals: Which Countries Really Have More Than One?

0

Most countries are easy to match with a capital. France has Paris, Japan has Tokyo, and Egypt has Cairo. But the idea that every country concentrates its political authority in a single city does not always hold up.

South Africa officially divides capital functions among three cities. Eswatini has separate administrative and royal and legislative capitals. Honduras constitutionally makes two cities jointly its capital. Bolivia, meanwhile, has a constitutional capital in Sucre but its seat of government in La Paz.

So How Many Countries have Multiple Capitals?

There is no universally accepted number.

The reason is simple: a capital, seat of government, administrative center, legislative capital, and commercial capital are not necessarily the same thing. Some countries explicitly give capital roles to several cities. Others legally recognize only one capital while major government institutions operate somewhere else.

That distinction is the key to understanding the world’s countries with multiple capitals.

Countries With Multiple Capitals at a Glance

The table below separates genuine multi-capital arrangements from countries that divide capital and government functions between cities.

CountryCitiesOfficial or legal statusMain functionsBest classification
South AfricaPretoria, Cape Town, BloemfonteinGovernment recognizes three capitalsAdministrative, legislative, judicialFormal three-capital system
EswatiniMbabane, LobambaBoth have recognized capital rolesAdministrative; royal and legislativeFormal dual-capital system
HondurasTegucigalpa, ComayagüelaConstitution says the two cities jointly constitute the capitalJoint national capitalFormal two-city capital
BurundiGitega, BujumburaGovernment recognizes political and economic capitalsPolitical; economicSplit capital roles
Côte d’IvoireYamoussoukro, AbidjanGovernment describes them as political/administrative and economic capitalsPolitical and administrative; economicSplit capital roles
Sri LankaSri Jayawardenepura Kotte, ColomboGovernment identifies Kotte as the capital/administrative capital and Colombo as commercial capitalAdministrative; commercialSplit capital roles
BoliviaSucre, La PazSucre is constitutional capital; La Paz is seat of governmentConstitutional/judicial; executive and legislativeCapital + government seat
NetherlandsAmsterdam, The HagueAmsterdam is capital; The Hague is seat of governmentFormal capital; national governmentCapital + government seat
MalaysiaKuala Lumpur, PutrajayaKuala Lumpur remains national capital; Putrajaya is federal administrative centerNational capital; federal administrationCapital + administrative center
BeninPorto-Novo, CotonouPorto-Novo is capital; much of central government is based in CotonouFormal capital; government centerCapital + government seat

These arrangements are not legally equivalent. South Africa’s government explicitly identifies three capitals, while Malaysia explicitly says Kuala Lumpur remains the national capital even though the federal government’s administrative center is in Putrajaya. Honduras presents another variation: its constitution does not designate two capitals with different functions; instead, Tegucigalpa and Comayagüela jointly constitute one national capital. 

Why Is There No Exact Number of Countries With Multiple Capitals?

The disagreement begins with the word capital itself.

In its strictest sense, a capital is a city formally recognized as the principal seat of a country. But governments distribute authority in many different ways.

A country can have an administrative capital, where executive government operates; a legislative capital, where parliament meets; a judicial capital, associated with major courts; or a royal capital, associated with a monarchy.

Other terms, such as economic capital or commercial capital, usually describe a city’s national importance rather than giving it the same constitutional status as the political capital.

Then there is the seat of government: the city where the executive and major national institutions actually work. It does not have to be the legal capital.

Bolivia illustrates the problem perfectly. Article 6 of its constitution states that Sucre is the capital of Bolivia, while La Paz serves as the seat of government. 

Malaysia is another clear example. Putrajaya’s official planning authority describes Putrajaya as the Federal Government Administrative Centre and says the federal government moved there in 1999, but it explicitly adds that Kuala Lumpur remains Malaysia’s national capital city.

A list that calls both cities equal capitals therefore loses an important distinction.

1. South Africa: Pretoria, Cape Town and Bloemfontein

South Africa

South Africa is the clearest modern example of a country with multiple capitals.

Its government officially identifies three capital cities:

CityCapital role
PretoriaAdministrative
Cape TownLegislative
BloemfonteinJudicial

Pretoria is the center of national administration and executive government. Cape Town contains the country’s Parliament. Bloemfontein is designated the judicial capital and is home to the Supreme Court of Appeal. 

There is one useful complication: South Africa’s Constitutional Court is in Johannesburg, not Bloemfontein. The South African government itself notes this while continuing to classify Bloemfontein as the judicial capital.

Why does South Africa have three capitals?

The arrangement traces back to the political compromises surrounding the creation of the Union of South Africa in 1910. Rather than concentrating national institutions in one regional center, major government functions were distributed among different cities.

That makes South Africa fundamentally different from countries such as Malaysia or the Netherlands. Its three-city system is not simply the result of ministries spilling beyond one capital: the national government explicitly identifies all three cities as capitals. 

2. Eswatini: Mbabane and Lobamba

Eswatini

Eswatini has one of the clearest dual-capital arrangements in the world.

Mbabane is the administrative capital, while Lobamba is the royal and legislative capital.

The country’s permanent mission to the United Nations identifies Mbabane as a capital and specifically describes Lobamba as the royal and legislative capital. Eswatini’s Parliament is physically located in Lobamba.

The division reflects two different forms of national authority.

Mbabane developed as the modern administrative center, housing major government functions and public administration. Lobamba is closely associated with the monarchy, Parliament, and important national ceremonies.

That gives Eswatini a stronger claim to the description “country with two capitals” than countries where a second city merely hosts government ministries.

3. Honduras: Tegucigalpa and Comayagüela

Honduras

Honduras is one of the most interesting cases, and one that many multiple-capital lists overlook.

Article 8 of the Honduran Constitution states that Tegucigalpa and Comayagüela jointly constitute the capital of the Republic.

That wording matters.

Honduras does not divide executive, legislative, and judicial roles between two distant capitals in the way South Africa distributes national functions. Nor does it have one official capital and a separate seat of government like Bolivia.

Instead, two neighboring cities together form the national capital.

Tegucigalpa and Comayagüela lie on opposite sides of the Choluteca River and together form part of Honduras’s Central District.

So is Honduras a country with two capitals?

In a constitutional sense, it is better described as having a two-city capital rather than two independent national capitals. That nuance makes Honduras a particularly useful example of why simple capital counts can be misleading.

4. Burundi: Gitega and Bujumbura

Burundi explicitly distinguishes between Gitega, its political capital, and Bujumbura, its economic capital.

This is not merely an informal label used by travel guides. Burundi’s government currently describes the country as having:

Gitega: political capital

Bujumbura: economic capital

The distinction became formal through legislation adopted as Burundi moved its political capital away from Bujumbura. The country’s National Assembly recorded the law establishing Gitega as the political capital and Bujumbura as the economic capital. 

Bujumbura had long been the country’s principal capital and remains its largest economic center on Lake Tanganyika.

Gitega, located farther inland, now carries the political capital role.

Burundi therefore deserves a place in a broader list of countries with multiple capitals, although an economic capital does not represent the same kind of governmental function as South Africa’s legislative or administrative capitals.

5. Côte d’Ivoire: Yamoussoukro and Abidjan

Côte d’Ivoire similarly divides national importance between Yamoussoukro and Abidjan.

Government documents identify Yamoussoukro as the political and administrative capital and Abidjan as the economic capital.

Yamoussoukro received capital status in 1983, replacing Abidjan formally.

Yet Abidjan remains by far the country’s dominant economic metropolis and continues to contain many important institutions and diplomatic functions.

That makes Côte d’Ivoire different from a straightforward two-political-capital system. Yamoussoukro carries the country’s formal political and administrative capital status, while Abidjan’s capital designation is primarily economic.

This is another reason that merely counting every city containing the word capital produces misleading global totals.

6. Sri Lanka: Sri Jayawardenepura Kotte and Colombo

Sri Lanka is regularly described as a country with two capitals, but official terminology makes the distinction clearer.

The Sri Lankan government identifies Sri Jayawardenepura Kotte as the capital or administrative capital, while Colombo is the commercial capital. 

Sri Jayawardenepura Kotte contains Sri Lanka’s Parliament and became the country’s modern administrative capital following the transfer of capital functions away from Colombo.

Colombo remains the country’s largest commercial center and retains enormous economic and institutional importance. The Sri Lanka Tourism Development Authority says Colombo became the commercial capital after administrative functions were shifted to Sri Jayawardenepura Kotte. 

So Sri Lanka fits comfortably into a discussion of divided capital functions, but it should not be presented as though Colombo and Sri Jayawardenepura Kotte are two constitutionally equivalent political capitals.

7. Bolivia: Sucre and La Paz

Few countries create as much capital-city confusion as Bolivia.

The legally correct distinction is:

Sucre is the constitutional capital.

La Paz is the seat of government.

Bolivia’s constitution is unusually direct: Article 6 states that Sucre is the capital of Bolivia. A United Nations country document separately identifies Sucre as the constitutional capital and La Paz as the seat of government.

Much of Bolivia’s active political machinery operates in La Paz. The executive government and national legislature are based there, which is why maps, quizzes, and general references sometimes give La Paz as a capital.

But Sucre has not lost its constitutional status.

That makes Bolivia a textbook example of the difference between de jure capital status and the practical seat of national government.

8. Netherlands: Amsterdam and The Hague

The Netherlands has a similarly famous split.

Amsterdam is the capital of the Netherlands.

The Hague is the seat of government.

An official Dutch government publication states that Amsterdam has been the nation’s capital since the French era, while The Hague has traditionally served as the seat of government. 

The Dutch Parliament, national ministries, and much of the central government operate from The Hague.

So if a geography quiz asks for the capital of the Netherlands, Amsterdam is the correct answer.

If the question asks where the Dutch national government is based, the answer is The Hague.

Calling both cities “capitals” may be convenient shorthand, but capital + seat of government is the more precise classification.

9. Malaysia: Kuala Lumpur and Putrajaya

Malaysia is another country frequently described as having two capitals.

Officially, however:

Kuala Lumpur remains the national capital.

Putrajaya is the Federal Government Administrative Centre.

The federal government’s seat moved from Kuala Lumpur to Putrajaya in 1999, largely because of congestion and pressure on the older capital. Malaysia’s judiciary subsequently moved to Putrajaya as well.

But the important line in Putrajaya’s own official planning documentation is unambiguous: Kuala Lumpur remains Malaysia’s national capital city. 

Malaysia should therefore be included in a broad article about countries with multiple capital centers, but not presented as a country with two legally equal capitals.

10. Benin: Porto-Novo and Cotonou

Benin’s official capital is Porto-Novo, but much of the country’s central government operates from Cotonou.

Beninese government material explains that Porto-Novo’s capital status was reaffirmed after major state functions, including the presidency and ministries, had moved to Cotonou during the decades after independence. 

The World Bank likewise distinguishes Porto-Novo as the official capital and Cotonou as the seat of government. 

Cotonou is also the country’s largest economic center.

Benin consequently fits the same broad pattern as Bolivia and the Netherlands: formal capital status belongs to one city while much of the practical machinery of national government is concentrated in another.

Three Types of Multiple-Capital Arrangements

The cleanest way to understand the subject is by separating three different geographical arrangements.

Formal Multi-Capital or Multi-City Systems

South Africa is the clearest example because its government recognizes Pretoria, Cape Town, and Bloemfontein as three capitals. Eswatini recognizes different capital functions in Mbabane and Lobamba. Honduras is a special case because its constitution says Tegucigalpa and Comayagüela jointly constitute the national capital.

One Official Capital and Another Seat of Government

Bolivia, the Netherlands, Malaysia, and Benin fall most naturally into this category. One city retains formal or national-capital status, while another contains much of the working government or federal administration.

Political or Administrative Capital Plus an Economic or Commercial Capital

Burundi, Côte d’Ivoire, and Sri Lanka use capital terminology for cities with different political and economic roles. Their second capital should therefore not automatically be treated as equivalent to a constitutional or legislative capital.

This classification explains why there can be several defensible answers to “How many countries have multiple capitals?”

Why Do Countries Divide Capital Functions?

There is no single reason.

In some countries, the arrangement grew from political compromise. South Africa distributed major national functions geographically rather than concentrating them in a single city.

Elsewhere, history separated the legal capital from the practical government center. Bolivia retained Sucre’s constitutional status even after central government functions shifted toward La Paz.

Modern urban planning can also play a role. Malaysia created Putrajaya as a purpose-built administrative center while retaining Kuala Lumpur as the national capital. Official Putrajaya documentation says congestion in Kuala Lumpur was one reason the federal government moved. 

Monarchical tradition helps explain Eswatini, where Lobamba retains royal and legislative importance while Mbabane functions as the administrative capital.

In other countries, a city may lose its political-capital status without losing its economic dominance. Abidjan, Colombo, Bujumbura, and Cotonou illustrate how difficult it is to move a country’s commercial and institutional center simply by changing the official capital.

Other Countries Sometimes Included in Multiple-Capital Lists

Some countries appear on broader lists even though describing them as having multiple capitals requires more qualification.

CountryCities sometimes pairedWhy the case is different
ChileSantiago, ValparaísoSantiago is the capital; the National Congress sits in Valparaíso
TanzaniaDodoma, Dar es SalaamDodoma is the national capital; Dar es Salaam is the former capital and main commercial metropolis
South KoreaSeoul, SejongSeoul remains the capital; many ministries and agencies operate from Sejong
MontenegroPodgorica, CetinjePodgorica is the capital; Cetinje has the special status of Old Royal Capital

These examples are relevant because they separate national institutions geographically, but hosting parliament, ministries, or historic royal institutions does not by itself make a city an equal national capital.

That is why a reliable list needs to explain status rather than simply collecting city names.

Which Country Has Three Capitals?

South Africa has three capitals: Pretoria, Cape Town, and Bloemfontein.

Pretoria serves as the administrative capital, Cape Town as the legislative capital, and Bloemfontein as the judicial capital. The Constitutional Court is located separately in Johannesburg.

South Africa is the world’s clearest modern example of a sovereign state formally distributing capital functions among three cities.

Which Countries Have Two Capitals?

There is no single answer because “two capitals” can describe several different arrangements.

Eswatini is one of the strongest examples of a true dual-capital system, with administrative functions in Mbabane and royal-legislative functions in Lobamba. Honduras constitutionally makes Tegucigalpa and Comayagüela jointly its capital, although this is better understood as one national capital formed by two cities.

Burundi officially distinguishes political and economic capitals, while countries such as Bolivia, the Netherlands, Malaysia, and Benin separate formal capital status from the practical seat of government or administration.

The correct list therefore depends on what kind of capital is being counted.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many countries have multiple capitals?

There is no universally accepted total. The count changes depending on whether it includes only formally recognized political capitals or also seats of government, administrative capitals, legislative capitals, and economic or commercial capitals.

What country has the most capital cities?

South Africa is the clearest modern example, with three capital cities: Pretoria, Cape Town, and Bloemfontein.

Does Honduras have two capitals?

Honduras has an unusual arrangement. Article 8 of its constitution says Tegucigalpa and Comayagüela jointly constitute the capital of the Republic. It is therefore more precise to describe Honduras as having a two-city national capital rather than two separate capitals performing different national roles.

Is Bolivia’s capital Sucre or La Paz?

Sucre is Bolivia’s constitutional capital, while La Paz is the seat of government. Bolivia’s constitution explicitly names Sucre as the capital.

Is Amsterdam or The Hague the capital of the Netherlands?

Amsterdam is the capital. The Hague is the seat of government. The Dutch Parliament and central government operate from The Hague.

Does Malaysia have two capitals?

Not in the sense of two equal national capitals. Kuala Lumpur remains Malaysia’s national capital, while Putrajaya is its federal administrative center.

What are Sri Lanka’s capitals?

Sri Lankan government sources identify Sri Jayawardenepura Kotte as the capital or administrative capital and Colombo as the commercial capital.

Why does South Africa have three capitals?

South Africa’s multi-capital system developed from the political compromises involved in unifying different territories. Instead of placing all major government branches in one city, administrative, legislative, and judicial capital functions were distributed geographically.

The Bottom Line

There is no single worldwide number of countries with multiple capitals because the word capital can describe several different political and administrative roles.

South Africa is the clearest multi-capital country, with three officially recognized capitals. Eswatini divides administrative and royal-legislative functions between two capitals. Honduras is constitutionally unusual because Tegucigalpa and Comayagüela jointly form its national capital.

Other countries require more careful wording.

Bolivia has a constitutional capital and a separate seat of government. The Netherlands has a national capital and a different government seat. Malaysia keeps Kuala Lumpur as its national capital while administering much of the federal government from Putrajaya.

Burundi, Côte d’Ivoire, and Sri Lanka add another variation by distinguishing political or administrative capitals from economic or commercial capitals.

That is why the best answer is not simply a number. The world’s multiple-capital countries make sense only when we ask what legal and governmental role each city actually performs.

Transcontinental Countries: Which Countries Span Two Continents?

0

A transcontinental country has sovereign territory in more than one continent. Under the conventional seven continent model, Russia, Turkey, Kazakhstan, and Egypt are the clearest contiguous examples. Georgia and Azerbaijan can also qualify depending on where the Europe and Asia boundary is drawn, while France represents a different case because parts of the French Republic lie on separate continents.

There is therefore no single universally accepted number of transcontinental countries. The answer changes according to the continental boundary convention and whether geographically separate overseas territory is included.

The Geographic Answer: Russia, Turkey, Kazakhstan, and Egypt are the strongest examples of countries whose connected territory spans two continents. Georgia and Azerbaijan are convention dependent, while France is a major non contiguous transcontinental state.

Transcontinental Countries at a Glance

CountryContinentsHow It Spans ContinentsStatus
RussiaEurope and AsiaConventional Ural and Eurasian boundary crosses its territoryClear
TurkeyEurope and AsiaTurkish Straits divide Eastern Thrace from AnatoliaClear
KazakhstanEurope and AsiaConventional Ural boundary crosses western KazakhstanClear
EgyptAfrica and AsiaSinai Peninsula lies east of the Africa and Asia divideClear
GeorgiaEurope and AsiaDepends on the Caucasus boundary conventionConvention dependent
AzerbaijanEurope and AsiaDepends on the Caucasus boundary conventionConvention dependent
FranceEurope, South America, and other regionsIntegral French territory exists outside EuropeNon contiguous
IndonesiaAsia and the wider Oceanian regionWestern New Guinea creates a classification issueConvention dependent

The table deliberately separates clear cases from countries whose status depends on how continents or sovereign territories are defined.

Which Countries Are on Two Continents?

Under the conventional seven continent model, the four clearest contiguous transcontinental countries are Russia, Turkey, Kazakhstan, and Egypt.

Russia, Turkey, and Kazakhstan occupy territory on both sides of the conventional Europe and Asia boundary. Egypt lies mainly in Africa, while its Sinai Peninsula extends into Asia.

Georgia and Azerbaijan are less straightforward because their classification changes according to the boundary used through the Caucasus. France is different again: its transcontinental character comes from geographically separate parts of the French Republic outside metropolitan Europe.

This distinction explains why different sources give different totals for the number of transcontinental countries.

What Makes a Country Transcontinental?

A country can become transcontinental in more than one way. Separating these situations is more useful than placing every possible example into a single list.

1. A Continental Boundary Crosses Connected National Territory

These are the clearest cases.

A recognized continental boundary passes through the country’s continuous or closely connected sovereign territory.

Examples include:

  • Russia
  • Turkey
  • Kazakhstan
  • Egypt

Turkey provides perhaps the easiest example to visualize. Eastern Thrace lies in Europe, Anatolia lies in Asia, and the Bosporus and other Turkish Straits form part of the conventional boundary.

2. The Country’s Status Depends on the Continental Boundary Used

Continental boundaries are not equally clear everywhere.

The division between Europe and Asia through the Caucasus is particularly complicated. Depending on the convention, parts of Georgia and Azerbaijan can fall on the European side of the boundary while the rest lies in Asia.

These countries are best described as convention dependent transcontinental states rather than being presented as unquestioned cases.

3. Sovereign Territory Exists on Separate Continents

A country does not necessarily need one connected landmass crossing a continental boundary.

France is the strongest example. Metropolitan France lies in Europe, while French Guiana is an integral part of the French Republic in South America. Other parts of France are located overseas as well.

This creates a non contiguous form of transcontinental state.

How Many Transcontinental Countries Are There?

There is no universally agreed number of transcontinental countries.

Using a narrow definition based on connected sovereign territory crossing a conventional continental boundary, Russia, Turkey, Kazakhstan, and Egypt are the four clearest cases.

The number increases if:

  • Georgia and Azerbaijan are counted using particular Caucasus boundary conventions
  • geographically separated integral territory is included, as with France
  • broader interpretations of Asia, Australia, and Oceania are used for Indonesia
  • dependencies and other overseas possessions are treated as part of the calculation

A precise geography reference should therefore explain its methodology instead of claiming that the world has one fixed number of transcontinental countries.

Why Is the Number Debated?

The problem begins with the continents themselves.

Some continental boundaries are obvious because oceans separate major landmasses. Europe and Asia are different. They form one continuous landmass commonly called Eurasia.

Their separation is therefore based largely on geographic convention.

A commonly used boundary runs through or along the Ural Mountains, Ural River, Caspian Sea, Caucasus Mountains, Black Sea, Bosporus, and Dardanelles.

That convention clearly creates several transcontinental countries, but the Caucasus portion of the boundary can be interpreted differently.

The result is that a country can appear entirely Asian on one geographic classification and partly European on another.

There is also a second problem: not all overseas territories have the same constitutional relationship with the state that governs them.

That is why Russia and France can both be called transcontinental even though they qualify in very different ways.

1. Russia: Europe and Asia

Russia is the world’s largest transcontinental country and one of the clearest examples of a state spanning two continents.

Its territory stretches across the Eurasian landmass from Eastern Europe to the Pacific Ocean.

The conventional boundary between European and Asian Russia follows the Ural region before continuing south toward the Caspian and Black Sea systems.

Most of Russia’s land area lies in Asia, particularly across Siberia and the Russian Far East. Many of its largest population centers and historic political centers, however, are in the European part of the country.

Moscow and St. Petersburg are both west of the conventional continental boundary.

This produces an important distinction between territorial geography and national identity. Russia may be discussed as European in many historical, political, and cultural contexts, but geographically its sovereign territory occupies both Europe and Asia.

Its classification as transcontinental does not depend on overseas possessions or an unusual interpretation of sovereignty. The continental boundary passes directly through the country.

2. Turkey: Europe and Asia

Turkey is another unmistakable transcontinental country.

Most of Turkey lies in Anatolia, or Asia Minor, which is geographically in Asia. A much smaller part, Eastern Thrace, lies in southeastern Europe.

The two portions are separated by the Turkish Straits system, which includes the Bosporus, Sea of Marmara, and Dardanelles.

This makes Turkey’s continental division unusually visible.

The country also contains one of the world’s most famous transcontinental cities. Istanbul occupies both sides of the Bosporus, with districts in Europe and Asia.

Someone crossing one of Istanbul’s Bosporus bridges can therefore travel between continents without leaving the same city.

Turkey’s transcontinental status is geographic rather than merely cultural. The conventional Europe and Asia boundary passes through the heart of its sovereign territory.

3. Kazakhstan: Europe and Asia

Kazakhstan is overwhelmingly associated with Central Asia, but part of its territory lies in Europe under the widely used Ural based continental division.

The key boundary is associated with the Ural Mountains and Ural River.

Most of Kazakhstan lies east of that boundary and is therefore geographically Asian. Territory in the country’s far west extends onto the European side.

This makes Kazakhstan a useful example of an important principle: a transcontinental country does not need to be divided equally between continents.

Only a relatively small share of Kazakhstan lies in Europe, yet that is enough for the country to span both Europe and Asia geographically.

Its political and regional identity as a Central Asian state does not alter the location of its western territory.

4. Egypt: Africa and Asia

Egypt spans Africa and Asia.

Almost all of the country’s land and population centers lie in northeastern Africa, but the Sinai Peninsula lies in Asia.

The commonly used continental division follows the narrow connection between Africa and Asia around the Isthmus of Suez and the Suez Canal.

Cairo, Alexandria, the Nile Valley, and most of Egypt are therefore African. The Sinai Peninsula lies on the Asian side.

Egypt differs from Russia, Turkey, and Kazakhstan because its transcontinental divide is between Africa and Asia, rather than Europe and Asia.

It is nevertheless a strong and straightforward example of a contiguous transcontinental country because both portions form part of the same sovereign state and are geographically connected around Suez.

The Caucasus Problem: Georgia and Azerbaijan

Georgia and Azerbaijan require more careful language than the four countries above.

The issue is not whether either country physically moves between continents. It is where geographers decide that Europe ends and Asia begins.

The Greater Caucasus Mountains are commonly used as part of the Europe and Asia boundary, but the exact line has not always been applied identically.

This makes both countries valuable examples of why transcontinental geography is partly conventional.

5. Is Georgia in Europe or Asia?

Georgia lies in the South Caucasus between the Black Sea, Russia, Turkey, Armenia, and Azerbaijan.

Under a boundary that follows the Greater Caucasus watershed or crest, small portions of Georgia can fall on the European side while most of the country remains south of the divide in Asia.

That would make Georgia transcontinental.

Other geographical classifications place Georgia entirely within Western Asia.

Georgia also has strong cultural and political connections with Europe, but those relationships should not be confused with the physical question.

The most accurate description is therefore:

Georgia is a convention dependent transcontinental country.

Whether it physically spans Europe and Asia depends on the continental boundary being used.

6. Is Azerbaijan Transcontinental?

Azerbaijan presents a similar situation.

Most of Azerbaijan lies south of the Greater Caucasus and is generally associated with Western Asia. If the continental divide follows the Greater Caucasus watershed, however, some northern territory can lie on the European side.

That allows Azerbaijan to be described as spanning Europe and Asia under that convention.

Its position near the boundary is widely recognized, but a careful geography article should not imply that every atlas uses exactly the same classification.

The best description is:

Azerbaijan is transcontinental under commonly used Caucasus boundary conventions, but its status is less clear cut than Russia, Turkey, Kazakhstan, or Egypt.

Countries Often Confused With Transcontinental States

Not every country associated with two continental regions actually has territory clearly divided between two continents.

Armenia and Cyprus illustrate the problem.

Armenia

Armenia is frequently discussed alongside Georgia and Azerbaijan because all three form the South Caucasus.

Under the widely used Greater Caucasus continental boundary, however, Armenia lies south of the Europe and Asia divide and is therefore geographically in Asia.

Its cultural, historical, or political relationships with Europe do not by themselves make it geographically transcontinental.

Alternative definitions of Europe’s boundary can produce different regional discussions, but Armenia should not automatically be added to a strict physical list of countries on two continents.

Cyprus

Cyprus presents a different problem.

The island lies in the eastern Mediterranean close to Western Asia, while its historical, cultural, and political relationships connect it strongly with Europe.

Under National Geographic’s mapping policy, Cyprus marks the southeastern extent of Europe.

That does not make Cyprus comparable with Turkey or Russia, however.

There is no conventional continental boundary cutting through the island and dividing its sovereign territory between Europe and Asia.

Cyprus is therefore better treated as a continental affiliation case, not one of the clearest transcontinental countries.

Contiguous and Non Contiguous Transcontinental Countries

The term transcontinental becomes much clearer when countries are divided into two broad types.

Contiguous Transcontinental Countries

These states have connected territory spanning a continental boundary.

The clearest examples are:

  • Russia
  • Turkey
  • Kazakhstan
  • Egypt

Georgia and Azerbaijan may also fit this category depending on the Caucasus convention used.

Non Contiguous Transcontinental Countries

These countries have sovereign territory in separate geographic regions that lie on different continents.

France is the strongest example.

This distinction matters because a country extending continuously across Europe and Asia is geographically different from a state whose sovereign territory is distributed across oceans.

Both can be transcontinental, but not for the same reason.

Is France a Transcontinental Country?

France can reasonably be classified as a non contiguous transcontinental country.

Metropolitan France lies in Europe, but the French Republic also includes overseas departments and regions outside Europe.

French Guiana is in South America. Guadeloupe and Martinique are in the Caribbean, while Réunion and Mayotte lie in the Indian Ocean region.

French Guiana is particularly important to the transcontinental question because it is not simply an informal overseas possession. France’s overseas departments are integrated into the French Republic in the same capacity as departments and regions in metropolitan France.

That means sovereign French territory exists in Europe and South America.

France therefore differs from Russia or Egypt in form, but it still fits a broader territorial definition of a transcontinental state.

Do Overseas Territories Make a Country Transcontinental?

Not automatically.

The legal relationship between a territory and the sovereign state matters.

Three situations should be distinguished:

  1. A continental boundary crosses the country’s connected territory, as in Russia or Turkey.
  2. Geographically separate territory is constitutionally integrated into the sovereign state, as with French Guiana and France.
  3. A state administers a dependency or territory with a distinct constitutional status.

These situations are often mixed together in online transcontinental country lists.

That can produce very long lists in which fundamentally different geographic and legal relationships are treated as though they were identical.

For a reader asking which countries are physically located on two continents, the first category provides the clearest answer.

For a broader sovereignty based definition, France becomes highly relevant.

Other Boundary Dependent Cases

A few countries sometimes appear in broader discussions of transcontinental geography but should not be treated as equal to the four core examples.

Is Indonesia Transcontinental?

Indonesia is a particularly interesting case because it extends from Southeast Asia into the western half of the island of New Guinea.

Most of Indonesia is geographically associated with Asia. New Guinea, by contrast, is normally associated with the wider Oceanian region.

However, there is a terminology problem.

Under National Geographic’s seven continent model, Australia is the continent, while Oceania is a geographic region associated with Australia rather than a continent itself.

That means saying Indonesia simply spans “Asia and Oceania” does not automatically establish that it occupies two continents under every model.

Indonesia can reasonably be described as transregional or convention dependent, and some definitions consider it transcontinental because Indonesian New Guinea lies within the wider Oceanian geographic realm.

It should not, however, be presented with the same certainty as Russia, Turkey, Kazakhstan, or Egypt.

What About Panama?

Panama occasionally appears in broader lists because it occupies the narrow land bridge connecting North and South America.

Its inclusion depends on where a particular classification places the continental boundary across the Americas.

It is therefore better treated as a secondary boundary question rather than a core transcontinental country.

For a concise, defensible list, Panama should not be grouped with the four clear contiguous cases.

Why Europe and Asia Create So Many Transcontinental Countries

Most of the best known transcontinental countries involve Europe and Asia for one simple reason: there is no ocean separating the two continents.

Europe and Asia form the continuous landmass of Eurasia.

Their division reflects a long geographic and cultural convention. A commonly used boundary follows geographic features including the Urals, Caspian region, Caucasus, Black Sea, Bosporus, and Dardanelles.

That line intersects the territory of several modern states.

Russia, Kazakhstan, and Turkey are obvious results. Georgia and Azerbaijan become more complicated because of disagreements over the Caucasus portion.

This is why Europe and Asia generate more classification questions than continents separated by broad oceans.

Are Europe and Asia Really Separate Continents?

Physically, Europe and Asia form a single continuous landmass.

The idea of treating them as separate continents developed historically and culturally rather than from a complete geological break.

That does not make the continents meaningless. Continental categories remain useful for geography, education, history, culture, and regional organization.

It does mean that the boundary between Europe and Asia is partly conventional.

As a result, asking whether a country such as Georgia is “in Europe or Asia?” can have more than one defensible answer depending on the geographic system being applied.

Is Istanbul on Two Continents?

Yes. Istanbul is a transcontinental city located in both Europe and Asia.

The Bosporus passes through the city and forms part of the conventional Europe and Asia divide.

Istanbul’s European districts lie west of the Bosporus, while its Asian districts lie east of it.

Bridges, ferries, rail tunnels, and road tunnels connect the two sides.

Few places make the idea of transcontinental geography as tangible as Istanbul because a journey across the city can also be a journey from one continent to another.

Are Russia and Turkey Both European and Asian?

Yes, geographically both countries occupy parts of Europe and Asia.

Russia extends eastward from European Russia across Siberia and the Russian Far East. Turkey consists mainly of Asian Anatolia with a smaller European section in Eastern Thrace.

Neither country is divided equally between continents.

That is not required.

A transcontinental classification describes the geographic location of sovereign territory, not the percentage of land or population found on each side of the boundary.

Clear vs Disputed Transcontinental Countries

The most useful way to organize transcontinental countries is by how securely they fit the definition.

CategoryCountriesExplanation
Clear contiguous casesRussia, Turkey, Kazakhstan, EgyptWidely used continental boundaries cross connected sovereign territory
Caucasus dependent casesGeorgia, AzerbaijanStatus depends on the Europe and Asia boundary convention
Non contiguous caseFranceIntegral sovereign territory exists on separate continents
Other convention dependent caseIndonesiaDepends partly on treatment of Australia and Oceania
Usually not counted as clear physical casesArmenia, Cyprus, PanamaGeographic affiliation or boundary definitions complicate inclusion

This approach explains why there is no responsible one number answer without first defining what counts.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a transcontinental country?

A transcontinental country is a sovereign state with territory in more than one continent. It may have connected territory crossing a continental boundary, as Russia does, or geographically separate sovereign territory on another continent, as France does.

Which countries are definitely on two continents?

Under the conventional seven continent model, Russia, Turkey, Kazakhstan, and Egypt are the four clearest contiguous transcontinental countries.

How many transcontinental countries are there?

There is no universally accepted number. Four countries are especially clear contiguous cases. The total increases when convention dependent countries such as Georgia and Azerbaijan or non contiguous cases such as France are included.

Is Russia in Europe or Asia?

Russia is geographically in both Europe and Asia. The conventional Europe and Asia boundary divides western European Russia from the much larger Asian portion of the country.

Is Turkey in Europe or Asia?

Turkey spans both. Most of its territory is in Asian Anatolia, while Eastern Thrace is in Europe.

Is Kazakhstan in Europe or Asia?

Kazakhstan is mostly in Asia, but territory in its west lies in Europe under the conventional Ural based continental boundary.

Is Egypt in Africa or Asia?

Egypt spans both Africa and Asia. Most of the country is in Africa, while the Sinai Peninsula lies in Asia.

Is Georgia in Europe or Asia?

Georgia’s classification depends on the Europe and Asia boundary used. Under a Greater Caucasus boundary convention, Georgia can have territory in both continents.

Is Azerbaijan a transcontinental country?

Azerbaijan can be transcontinental under commonly used Caucasus boundary conventions because part of its northern territory may lie on the European side of the divide.

Is Armenia transcontinental?

Under the widely used Greater Caucasus boundary, Armenia lies south of the continental divide in Asia. It is therefore not one of the strongest physical transcontinental cases.

Is Istanbul in two continents?

Yes. Istanbul lies on both sides of the Bosporus, with territory in Europe and Asia.

Is France a transcontinental country?

Under a broader sovereignty based definition, yes. Metropolitan France lies in Europe, while French Guiana is an integral part of the French Republic located in South America.

Is Indonesia a transcontinental country?

Its status depends on the geographic model used. Most of Indonesia is associated with Asia, while Indonesian New Guinea lies in the wider Oceanian region. Under a seven continent model in which Australia is the continent and Oceania a region, the classification requires qualification.

The Bottom Line

There is no single universal list of transcontinental countries because not every case works the same way.

Under the conventional seven continent model, Russia, Turkey, Kazakhstan, and Egypt are the clearest countries whose connected sovereign territory spans two continents. Georgia and Azerbaijan are convention dependent because of the disputed Europe and Asia boundary through the Caucasus.

France belongs to a different category because integral parts of the French Republic are geographically separated across continents. Indonesia is another useful but convention dependent case, particularly because Oceania is treated as a region rather than a continent in some major geographic systems.

The most accurate approach is therefore not to chase one fixed number. It is to ask how a country’s sovereign territory relates to the continental boundary being used.

Countries With No Rivers: The Verified List

0

Some countries have no permanent natural rivers, but the often-repeated claim that there are exactly 17, 18 or 19 “riverless countries” is harder to defend than it appears. The problem is definition. A country may have no large conventional river yet still contain seasonal streams, wadis, springs or even short stretches of perennial flow. Once those distinctions are checked against hydrological sources, several countries commonly included on riverless lists no longer qualify. Using the absence of a permanent natural river or perennial natural surface watercourse as the working definition, this review finds 14 well-documented sovereign states. Vatican City is treated separately as a microstate edge case rather than being used to inflate the hydrological count.

In this article, “countries with no rivers” refers primarily to countries with no permanent natural rivers. Seasonal wadis, intermittent streams and storm runoff may still be present.

Countries With No Permanent Rivers at a Glance

CountryRegionPermanent River?Temporary Surface Flow?Why Rivers Are Absent
Saudi ArabiaArabian PeninsulaNoWadis and flash floodsExtreme aridity
QatarArabian PeninsulaNoLimited runoffAridity, small low-lying peninsula
KuwaitArabian PeninsulaNoShort-lived runoffAridity and high evaporation
BahrainPersian GulfNoLimited runoffSmall arid islands
United Arab EmiratesArabian PeninsulaNoNumerous wadisArid climate and intermittent rainfall
LibyaNorth AfricaNoSeasonal channelsSahara climate
DjiboutiHorn of AfricaNoBrief flood runoffArid to hyper-arid climate
MaltaMediterraneanNoSeasonal wiedsSmall islands and porous limestone
MaldivesIndian OceanNoVirtually noneTiny, flat coral islands
BahamasAtlantic/CaribbeanNoVery limitedFlat, permeable limestone islands
KiribatiPacificNoVirtually noneCoral atolls and low relief
Marshall IslandsPacificNoTemporary pondingLow coral atolls
NauruPacificNoVery limitedSmall, permeable island
TuvaluPacificNoVirtually noneLow coral atolls

This is not an official global count published by the United Nations or FAO. It is a source-based classification using the definition above.

Which Countries Have No Rivers?

The strongest documented examples of countries with no permanent natural rivers are Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait, Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates, Libya, Djibouti, Malta, Maldives, Bahamas, Kiribati, Marshall Islands, Nauru and Tuvalu. Some of these countries still have natural drainage channels. Saudi Arabia and the UAE, for example, contain extensive wadi systems that may carry large volumes of water after rain. The key distinction is that those channels do not normally sustain river flow throughout the year.

How Many Countries Have No Rivers?

There is no universally accepted number of countries with no rivers. Under the strict definition used here, 14 sovereign states have strong hydrological evidence supporting the absence of a permanent natural river. Vatican City can reasonably be described as having no river within its tiny sovereign territory, but it is better treated separately because its situation is fundamentally different from the hydrology of countries such as Saudi Arabia, Libya or Kiribati. This is why readers may encounter totals of 17, 18 or 19 elsewhere. Different lists count wadis differently, overlook perennial sections of supposedly seasonal watercourses, include microstates, or repeat older classifications without checking country-level hydrology.

Why Do Lists Give Different Numbers?

The disagreement is not simply a matter of somebody miscounting countries. It begins with what qualifies as a river. A perennial river normally carries water throughout the year under ordinary conditions. An intermittent stream flows during wetter periods but may dry up seasonally, while an ephemeral channel generally carries water only following rainfall. Then there are wadis. These dryland valleys are commonly associated with temporary storm runoff, but the name alone does not tell us whether flow is seasonal or permanent. That distinction changes the country list considerably.

CountryCommon ClaimEvidence That Complicates ItTreatment Here
OmanNo riversWadi Dayqah has documented perennial flowExcluded
YemenNo riversWadi Hajr has year-round baseflowExcluded
ComorosNo riversAnjouan and Mohéli have perennial streamsExcluded
TongaNo riversFreshwater streams occur on ʻEuaExcluded
MonacoNo riversMonaco identifies a valley with constant flowExcluded
Vatican CityNo riversTiny sovereign territory beside, not including, the TiberMicrostate edge case

These cases are more useful than an arbitrary final number because they show why a country-by-country check is necessary.

1. Saudi Arabia

Saudi Arabia

Saudi Arabia is the clearest large-scale example of a country without permanent rivers. FAO describes the country as having many large valleys but no permanent rivers or streams. Rainfall is sparse and irregular across most of Saudi Arabia, while high temperatures and evaporation make sustained surface flow difficult to maintain. That does not mean the landscape is devoid of drainage. Saudi Arabia contains an extensive network of wadis. During intense storms, some can fill rapidly and produce destructive flash floods. Between rainfall events, however, they usually return to dry channels. Groundwater has historically supplied much of Saudi Arabia’s freshwater needs, while desalination has become a critical component of modern urban water supply. The scale makes Saudi Arabia particularly notable: a country covering more than two million square kilometres has no conventional perennial river network.

2. Qatar

Qatar

Qatar has no permanent natural river. The small peninsula is extremely arid, with limited rainfall, high evaporation and little topographic relief capable of organizing runoff into sustained river systems. FAO’s water-resource profile emphasizes groundwater and unconventional supplies rather than river resources. Rain can still create temporary surface runoff, particularly during unusually heavy storms, so “no rivers” should not be taken to mean that water never moves naturally across the land. Modern Qatar relies heavily on desalination alongside groundwater and treated water.

3. Kuwait

Kuwait

Kuwait is a particularly useful example of the difference between no permanent river and no surface runoff. Kuwait’s Environment Public Authority explicitly states that the country has no permanent rivers. It also notes that streams and runoff can persist for a few hours after rainfall before disappearing because of the dry climate and high evaporation. So the accurate statement is not that Kuwait never experiences flowing water. It is that the flow is too short-lived to form a perennial river. Desalination, groundwater and treated wastewater are the country’s main water sources.

4. Bahrain

Bahrain

Bahrain has no perennial streams. FAO records only a very small volume of surface runoff and explicitly notes the absence of perennial streams. The island country has historically received groundwater through the regional aquifer system extending from Saudi Arabia, while desalination has become increasingly important. Bahrain illustrates how a combination of small land area and an arid Gulf climate can prevent the development of permanent river networks.

5. United Arab Emirates

United Arab Emirates

The United Arab Emirates has no permanent flowing river system, but it has many wadis. The UAE’s federal geographic and infrastructure material identifies scarcity of rainfall, high temperatures and the absence of a permanent flowing water source as central characteristics of the country’s water environment. Mountain wadis in the northern and eastern Emirates can carry impressive flows following heavy rain. Those episodes, however, are intermittent rather than year-round. This makes the UAE a genuine no-permanent-river country without making it a country devoid of natural drainage.

6. Libya

Libya

Libya has no perennial rivers. FAO describes its river system succinctly: surface water is limited to short seasonal rivers, and flash floods can follow intense rainstorms. The reason is obvious on a continental scale. Most of Libya lies within the Sahara, where rainfall is extremely scarce and irregular. Groundwater therefore has a much greater role in Libya than surface water. Large fossil groundwater reserves have supported settlements, agriculture and water-transfer infrastructure.

7. Djibouti

Djibouti

Djibouti also has no perennial rivers. FAO attributes this directly to the country’s arid to extremely arid climate and irregular rainfall. Surface runoff generally occurs for only a day or two after relatively heavy rainfall. Djibouti’s rugged terrain means storm water can move rapidly through valleys and channels, but the rainfall supply is too inconsistent to keep those systems flowing permanently.

8. Malta

Malta

Malta lacks permanent streams and rivers, even though its climate is far less extreme than those of Saudi Arabia or Libya. FAO describes the Maltese islands as having no lakes or permanent streams, while seasonal channels occur in deeply cut valleys known locally as wieds. Geology is a major part of the explanation. Malta is dominated by porous limestone. Much of its rainfall infiltrates the ground instead of remaining at the surface long enough to build a perennial drainage network. That makes Malta a useful reminder that riverlessness is not caused by desert climate alone.

9. Maldives

Maldives

The Maldives has no rivers or streams. FAO descriptions of the archipelago repeatedly emphasize that its coral islands are flat, extremely small and highly porous. Rainfall seeps downward and forms freshwater lenses rather than collecting into river channels. Many islands rise only a few metres above sea level. Even though the Maldives receives substantial tropical rainfall, there is simply too little land area and topographic relief for conventional river systems to develop. Freshwater lenses, rainwater harvesting and desalination therefore matter far more than surface drainage.

10. Bahamas

Bahamas

The Bahamas has no rivers. FAO states directly that the archipelago has no rivers and only a small number of freshwater ponds. Its freshwater is found largely in underground lenses. The islands’ geology explains why. Much of the Bahamas consists of highly permeable limestone, and the land is exceptionally flat. Rainwater readily infiltrates underground rather than forming persistent streams. An FAO forestry assessment similarly describes the Bahamian islands as generally flat and without rivers.

11. Kiribati

Kiribati

Kiribati has no rivers, lakes or conventional freshwater impoundments. FAO states this explicitly. Most of the country’s islands are coral atolls. They are narrow, low and highly permeable, leaving almost no opportunity for water to collect into sustained surface channels. Instead, communities rely heavily on rainfall and fragile groundwater lenses. These lenses can be threatened by drought, over-extraction, contamination and saltwater intrusion.

12. Marshall Islands

Marshall Islands

The Marshall Islands is another low-atoll country without rivers. Regional Pacific environmental research groups the Marshall Islands with Tuvalu, Nauru and Kiribati as island states that have no rivers and consequently face constrained freshwater supplies. Rainfall and shallow groundwater lenses provide much of the natural freshwater resource. Temporary ponding may occur after heavy rainfall, but that is very different from a permanent stream or river.

13. Nauru

Nauru

Nauru has no freshwater streams. FAO states that the island has no freshwater streams or substantial freshwater bodies apart from one or two springs; its central lagoon and several smaller ponds are brackish. Nauru’s small area and permeable geology severely limit the development of surface drainage. Rainwater collection and groundwater therefore play much larger roles in freshwater supply than natural surface flow.

14. Tuvalu

Tuvalu

Tuvalu has no rivers. Like Kiribati and the Marshall Islands, Tuvalu consists largely of very low coral islands and atolls. Regional environmental literature specifically includes Tuvalu among Pacific countries with no rivers. Its low relief means rainfall cannot organize itself into long drainage systems. Instead, freshwater is stored primarily as collected rainwater or within fragile groundwater lenses.

What About Vatican City?

Vatican City belongs in a different category from the 14 countries above. The sovereign state covers just 0.44 square kilometres and lies close to the right bank of the Tiber. The Vatican’s own geographic description makes clear that the state occupies Vatican Hill and adjacent territory rather than the river itself. There is therefore no river running through Vatican City’s sovereign territory. It can technically be added to a geopolitical list of countries without rivers, producing 15 cases, but doing so mixes two quite different questions:

  • Which countries lack permanent rivers because of their physical geography?
  • Which sovereign territories simply contain no river within their borders?

For a geography-focused comparison, we therefore keep Vatican City as a microstate edge case, not part of the core 14-country hydrological list.

Why Monaco Is Not on This List

Monaco is frequently included in lists of countries with no rivers, but its own government provides a reason to be cautious. A Monegasque environmental publication describes runoff from the Noix Valley as the only valley in the Principality with constant flow. Under the strict definition used in this article — no permanent natural surface watercourse — that evidence is enough to prevent us from confidently classifying Monaco as riverless. This is precisely the kind of detail that disappears when lists are copied from one website to another.

Does Saudi Arabia Have Rivers?

Saudi Arabia has no permanent natural rivers or streams. FAO specifically documents their absence. It does, however, have numerous wadis. These valleys can remain dry for months and then carry powerful flows following intense rainfall. Some flash-flood events can be severe, but temporary flow does not turn a wadi into a perennial river. For this reason, saying “Saudi Arabia has no rivers” is broadly understandable, while “Saudi Arabia has no permanent rivers” is geographically more precise.

What Is the Largest Country Without a Permanent River?

Saudi Arabia is the largest country in the core verified group of countries without permanent rivers. It covers more than two million square kilometres, while Libya — another very large country without perennial rivers — covers about 1.76 million square kilometres. FAO gives Libya’s area as 1,759,540 km² and confirms the absence of perennial rivers. Saudi Arabia’s size is important because it shows that large drainage basins alone do not guarantee river formation. A river also needs a sufficiently dependable water supply.

Why Do Some Countries Have No Permanent Rivers?

Permanent rivers require more than occasional rain. A drainage basin needs enough sustained water input — from precipitation, snowmelt, lakes, springs or groundwater — to maintain flow between individual weather events. Several different processes can prevent that from happening.

Rainfall Is Too Low or Irregular

This is the dominant factor across Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait, Bahrain, the UAE, Libya and Djibouti. Rain may fall intensely enough to create floods, but long dry periods prevent year-round flow.

Evaporation Is High

Hot, dry air removes water quickly from exposed surfaces. In Kuwait, for example, the national environmental authority notes that runoff may disappear within hours after rainfall.

Water Moves Underground

Porous rock can be just as important as climate. In Malta and the Bahamas, permeable limestone allows much of the rain to infiltrate rather than travel long distances over the surface.

Islands Are Too Small

A large watershed collects water from a wide area. Tiny islands in Maldives and the Pacific have very small catchments. Rain has little distance to travel before it reaches the ocean or moves underground.

The Terrain Is Too Flat

Low coral atolls combine small area with minimal relief. With little elevation gradient, water is less likely to organize itself into long, defined drainage channels. This is characteristic of Kiribati, Marshall Islands and Tuvalu.

How Do Countries Without Rivers Get Fresh Water?

Countries without rivers use very different combinations of water sources.

Desalination

Seawater desalination is especially important around the Arabian Peninsula. Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait, Bahrain and the UAE all use desalinated water extensively. Kuwait’s environmental authority lists desalinated water alongside groundwater and treated wastewater as one of the country’s three principal water sources.

Groundwater

Aquifers can exist even where surface rivers do not. Libya relies heavily on groundwater, including non-renewable fossil reserves. Qatar and Bahrain also have important aquifer systems.

Freshwater Lenses

On small coral islands, rainwater can infiltrate the ground and form a lens of freshwater floating above denser seawater. This is an important natural water store in Maldives, Kiribati and other low island states.

Rainwater Harvesting

For many Pacific islands, the roof of a house effectively becomes part of the water-supply system. Rain collected in tanks can be essential during normal conditions, although prolonged drought creates serious vulnerability.

Treated Wastewater

Water-scarce countries increasingly reuse treated wastewater for irrigation, landscaping and other purposes where drinking-water quality is unnecessary. Riverlessness therefore does not mean a country has no water. It means its freshwater system works differently.

Is a Wadi a River?

Not automatically. A wadi is generally a valley or drainage channel associated with dry regions. Many remain dry for much of the year and carry runoff only after rainfall. But the term describes a geomorphological feature rather than a fixed flow regime. That distinction is important because some wadis contain perennial sections. Oman’s Wadi Dayqah is the clearest example relevant to this list. FAO identifies it as the country’s only perennial flow, extending for about 30 km. That is why Oman is excluded here rather than copied into the riverless category. The lesson is simple: a watercourse should be classified by how it behaves, not merely by what it is called.

River vs Perennial River vs Intermittent Stream

WatercourseTypical FlowNatural?Usually Year-Round?
Perennial riverSustained flow under normal conditionsYesYes
Intermittent riverFlows during wetter parts of the yearYesNo
Ephemeral streamFlows mainly after rainfall eventsYesNo
WadiUsually intermittent or ephemeralYesUsually no
CanalManaged or engineered flowNoVariable

These distinctions explain why “countries with no rivers” is a more complicated geographic category than the search phrase suggests.

Countries Commonly Called Riverless That We Excluded

Oman

Oman is often described as having no rivers because most of its drainage occurs through wadis. However, FAO identifies Wadi Dayqah as an approximately 30 km perennial flow. That makes Oman incompatible with this article’s strict definition.

Yemen

Yemen is dominated by seasonal wadis, but not every natural flow is temporary. Recent FAO work identifies year-round baseflow in Wadi Hajr. That means Yemen should not be described as unequivocally having no permanent natural surface watercourse.

Comoros

The “Comoros has no rivers” claim usually appears to generalize the geology of Grande Comore to the entire country. That is misleading. Other islands in the union, particularly Anjouan and Mohéli, have permanent streams. The sovereign state therefore does not qualify.

Tonga

Tonga is frequently included in riverless lists, but the situation varies by island. National information documents freshwater streams on ʻEua. A country-level statement that Tonga has no natural flowing water is therefore too broad.

Monaco

Monaco might look like an obvious no-river microstate, but official Monegasque material describes the Noix Valley as having constant flow. That is sufficient reason to leave Monaco off a strict verified list.

Where Are Countries Without Permanent Rivers Concentrated?

The 14 core countries fall into two especially clear geographical patterns. The first is the arid-country pattern. Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait, Bahrain, UAE, Libya and Djibouti lack perennial rivers primarily because rainfall is too limited or inconsistent to maintain them. The second is the small-island pattern. Maldives, Bahamas, Kiribati, Marshall Islands, Nauru and Tuvalu have little opportunity to develop river systems because their islands are small, flat, permeable or some combination of the three. Malta sits between these patterns. It receives Mediterranean winter rainfall, but its limited size and porous limestone geology prevent permanent streams from developing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which countries have no rivers?

Fourteen sovereign countries have particularly strong documentation supporting the absence of permanent natural rivers: Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait, Bahrain, UAE, Libya, Djibouti, Malta, Maldives, Bahamas, Kiribati, Marshall Islands, Nauru and Tuvalu. Vatican City is a separate microstate edge case.

How many countries have no rivers?

There is no official universally accepted total. Using a strict definition of no permanent natural river, this review identifies 14 well-documented hydrological cases. Including Vatican City as a border-based microstate case would make 15, but it is better treated separately.

What country has no rivers?

Saudi Arabia is the most prominent example. It has numerous wadis that carry storm runoff but no permanent rivers or streams.

What is the largest country without a permanent river?

Saudi Arabia is the largest country in the verified group. Its vast area makes its lack of perennial rivers particularly notable.

Does Saudi Arabia have rivers?

Saudi Arabia has no permanent rivers, but it has extensive wadis that may carry water following rain.

Does Qatar have rivers?

Qatar has no permanent natural rivers. Its freshwater supply instead depends heavily on groundwater and desalination.

Does Kuwait have rivers?

Kuwait has no permanent rivers. Temporary streams and runoff can appear after rainfall but may last only a few hours.

Does the UAE have rivers?

The UAE has no permanent river system. Numerous wadis carry intermittent runoff after rainfall, particularly in mountainous areas.

Does Oman have rivers?

Oman lacks conventional large rivers, but Wadi Dayqah has documented perennial flow. Oman is therefore excluded from this article’s strict riverless classification.

Are wadis rivers?

Some wadis function as temporary streams, while a small number contain perennial flow. “Wadi” alone does not indicate whether a watercourse is permanent.

How do countries without rivers get freshwater?

They use combinations of desalination, groundwater, freshwater lenses, rainwater harvesting and treated wastewater.

Can a country receive heavy rainfall and still have no rivers?

Yes. Maldives demonstrates this well. Its islands receive tropical rainfall, but their tiny size, flat topography and porous coral geology prevent conventional river systems from forming.

The Bottom Line

There is no single official number of countries with no rivers, and that is more than a technicality.

Using a consistent definition and checking country-level hydrology produces 14 strong cases of sovereign states without permanent natural rivers. Vatican City can be added as a microstate border case, while Oman, Yemen, Comoros, Tonga and

Monaco are better excluded because evidence shows permanent or otherwise significant natural surface flow.

The geographic lesson is more interesting than the final count. Some countries lack rivers because they are extremely dry; others receive plenty of rain but are too small, flat or permeable to sustain surface drainage.

For that reason, “countries without permanent rivers” is usually the most accurate way to describe the group.

Israel’s Point-of-View of Vulnerable Geography

0

Part of a Geographic Travels series examining how governments and institutions map geographic vulnerability, and what those maps reveal, emphasize or leave out.

Editor’s note: This article was originally published on Geographic Travels in July 2010. It has been independently rewritten, expanded and fact-checked in 2026 while preserving the original article’s focus on maps of geographic vulnerability.

In this series, we use “vulnerable geography” to describe maps that visualize how terrain, distance, borders, population or infrastructure shape perceptions of security. It is not a formal academic term with a fixed scholarly definition; it is an editorial lens Geographic Travels uses to read this kind of cartography.

During the Cuban Missile Crisis, U.S. officials used maps showing how far Soviet missiles based in Cuba could reach. Missile-range maps preserved by the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library show how distance could turn an abstract strategic threat into something immediately visible: one Defense Department briefing board plotted the 1,100 and 2,200 nautical mile ranges of Soviet medium- and intermediate-range missiles, showing large parts of the United States falling within reach of a base ninety miles from Florida. Maps like these are a useful introduction to what Geographic Travels calls vulnerable geography.

Maps of geographic vulnerability are necessarily selective. They may show missile range, elevation, roads, population centers or territorial boundaries while leaving other variables outside the frame. That does not make a map inaccurate, but it does mean readers should distinguish between what the map measures and what argument its publisher draws from it.

Israel provides a useful case study because both official agencies and nongovernmental policy organizations have published maps emphasizing different dimensions of the country’s geographic security concerns. So do organizations documenting the situation on the other side of that same geography. Below are several of those maps and the arguments built on top of them.

The Home Front Command Maps

The Home Front Command Maps

The original 2010 Geographic Travels article featured a map from Israel’s Home Front Command (Pikud HaOref) showing how many seconds residents in different areas have to reach shelter after a rocket or missile launch is detected. Israel’s warning system divides locations according to the time available to reach protected space, though the zones and timings have changed as alert systems and threats have evolved. During the 2014 Gaza conflict, communities near the Gaza border generally had around 15 seconds to take cover, compared with roughly 90 seconds for residents of Tel Aviv and Jerusalem, a range documented across multiple contemporaneous and retrospective accounts of that period’s alert system. Warning windows have shifted since, including brief periods of far shorter notice during direct missile exchanges with Iran in 2025. For anyone in Israel today, the operative source is current Home Front Command guidance, not a historical snapshot.

Their stated purpose is civil defense. In the context of this article, however, they also illustrate how strongly warning time is affected by geographic distance from likely launch areas.

Historical warning-time map. Alert zones and protection times change; consult current Home Front Command guidance for emergency information.

The “Defensible Borders” Argument

The strategic idea usually described as “defensible borders” predates the institutional campaign most associated with it today. One influential early expression was Yigal Allon’s proposal after the 1967 Six-Day War for Israeli control of a security strip roughly 10 to 15 kilometers wide along the Jordan Valley and the Dead Sea, intended to give Israel a defensible eastern frontier while returning the more densely populated central West Bank to Jordanian administration. The plan was never officially adopted, but it shaped Labor government settlement policy in the Jordan Valley for a decade afterward.

Decades later, the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, renamed the Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs (JCFA) in 2024, became one of the most prominent institutional advocates of this approach through its long-running Defensible Borders initiative. The argument rests on measurable physical facts: under the 1949 Armistice Lines, often called the Green Line, Israel narrowed at its central section to roughly 15 kilometers, about nine miles, between that line and the Mediterranean. JCFA material argues that roughly 70% of Israel’s population and 80% of its industry remain concentrated in the coastal cities adjacent to that narrow corridor, though that specific figure is JCFA’s own estimate rather than an independently audited statistic.

The Jordan Rift is dramatically lower than the central mountain ridge to its west. Parts of the rift, including the Dead Sea, sit roughly 430 metres below sea level, while sections of the central ridge running through the West Bank rise to roughly 900 to 1,000 metres above sea level. Defensible-borders advocates argue that this combination of elevation, distance and terrain would let Israeli forces defend an eastern approach with greater warning time and fewer disadvantages than positions farther west; that conclusion is a strategic interpretation of the terrain, not a feature of the terrain itself.

The importance assigned to the Jordan Valley was not limited to later think-tank publications. In his October 5, 1995 address to the Knesset on the Israeli-Palestinian Interim Agreement, a month before his assassination, Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin said Israel’s “security border” would be located “in the Jordan Valley, in the broadest meaning of that term.” The debate has intensified again since the October 7, 2023 attacks. Some Israeli security analysts have renewed arguments for long-term control of strategic terrain, while others argue that military security requirements need not determine permanent territorial sovereignty.

The Map From the Other Side

What the 2010 version of this article did not show is that Israeli and Palestinian organizations produce an equally direct form of vulnerable geography, aimed at demonstrating the opposite pressure: not the risk of losing strategic terrain, but the reality of already having lost access to it. Under the 1995 Oslo II agreement, the West Bank was divided into Areas A, B and C, each with different interim arrangements for Palestinian and Israeli civil and security authority. Later maps from the Israeli human rights organization B’Tselem and UN OCHA overlay those administrative divisions with settlements, the separation barrier and movement restrictions.

These maps focus on a different kind of geographic vulnerability: the distribution of administrative control, settlements, barriers and restrictions on movement. In a survey conducted in December 2025, OCHA documented 925 permanent or intermittent movement obstacles across the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, restricting the movement of an estimated 3.4 million Palestinians, a figure OCHA describes as 43% above the twenty-year annual average.

Security arguments about terrain should also be kept separate from questions of legal status. In its July 19, 2024 advisory opinion, the International Court of Justice found Israel’s continued presence in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967 unlawful, including its settlement activity. Advisory opinions of this kind are not automatically binding in the way a contentious-case judgment is, but they are widely treated by UN bodies and much of the international legal community as authoritative statements of the law. Israel rejects central elements of that legal characterization and maintains that the Oslo framework, not the ICJ opinion, remains the operative basis for allocating authority pending a negotiated settlement.

What This Series Is Actually About

The point of collecting vulnerable geography maps is not to decide which side’s cartography is more correct. The more useful questions are specific ones: who produced the map, and when. What does its legend actually measure. What territorial or legal assumptions does it build in. And what relevant information sits outside the frame.

Such maps can do two things at once: describe measurable geographic conditions and support a broader interpretation of what those conditions mean. Reading them well means asking what the map is measuring and what it is arguing, and treating those as two different questions.

Future entries in this series will look at how other contested regions, from the Korean Peninsula to the Taiwan Strait, produce their own versions of the same kind of map, and what physical terrain has to do with each one.

United States Overlaid the Moon

0

Reddit user boredboarder8 created the below image overlaying the United States on the Moon. The lower forty-eight United States would cover about twenty percent of the Moon’s surface but certainly would be visible from the Earth. (Hat tip: Flowing Data via friend Blueland)

The math works out as the forty-eight contiguous United States has a land area of 3,119,884 square miles (8,080,464 square kilometers). Meanwhile the Moon’s surface area is roughly 14,600,000 square miles (37,800,000 square kilometers). Therefore the United States would cover roughly 40 percent of the Moon’s visible surface.

United States overlaid on the Moon
The contiguous United States overlaid on the Moon for scale. Graphic by Reddit user boredboarder8.

How Big Is the United States Compared With the Moon?

The comparison is striking because the Moon is much smaller than it can appear from Earth. The contiguous United States covers a little over one-fifth of the Moon’s total surface area.

If only one lunar hemisphere is considered, the lower 48 states are equivalent to roughly two-fifths of that area. The graphic is best understood as a visual comparison rather than a precise equal-area projection, but it gives an immediate sense of scale.

Why the Comparison Is So Surprising

We normally think about the United States and the Moon using completely different scales. Putting the two directly together makes the relationship much easier to visualize.

At the same scale, the contiguous United States stretches across a substantial portion of the Moon’s visible face. It is a simple comparison, but one that makes the size of both the United States and the Moon easier to understand.

Maps of Meteorite Impacts

0

Last Friday I blogged about Near Earth Objects (NEOs), space debris which come dangerously close to the Earth. I mentioned how most objects are currently unknown. Lo and behold, that day south-central Russia experienced an air burst which wounded over a thousand people.

I began to wonder if there is any online database of other meteorite impacts, making a cartography of where Earth and Space literally met with violent results. The best two sites I can find are

Meteorite Size: Every Meteorite Fall on Earth Mapped

The Meteoritical Society’s website which has a database of impacts. The database is viewable in Google Earth.

Understanding Meteorite Maps

Maps like these make it possible to look at meteorite records geographically rather than as isolated discoveries. By plotting recorded locations, they provide a broader picture of where meteorites have been observed, recovered, or documented around the world.

There is an important distinction between meteorites found on the ground and atmospheric events such as the Russian air burst mentioned above. Not every object entering Earth’s atmosphere survives to reach the surface, and not every recovered meteorite represents a major impact event.

The 2013 Russian Meteor Event

The event mentioned above occurred over the Chelyabinsk region of Russia on February 15, 2013. The object exploded in the atmosphere, producing a powerful shock wave that damaged buildings and injured people across the region.

The Chelyabinsk event became one of the best documented modern examples of a space object entering Earth’s atmosphere over a populated area. It also highlighted the value of tracking Near Earth Objects and studying the geographic record of meteorite falls.

Meteorite Records and Databases

The Meteoritical Society’s Meteoritical Bulletin Database remains an important scientific reference for recognized meteorites. Meteorite records can include information such as names, classifications, locations, and whether an object was observed falling or was discovered later on the ground.

Although some of the original interactive maps and Google Earth tools linked in this 2013 post have changed or disappeared over time, the underlying idea remains fascinating: mapping meteorite records creates a geographic picture of places where Earth and material from space have quite literally met.

Map of Non-European Popes

0

Update: March 13, 2013

G

Updated map including Pope Francis

View Map of Non-European Popes in a larger map

———————————————————————————————————-

Pope Benedict XVI’s decision to resign has taken both the Catholic and non-Catholic worlds by immense shock.  Some have begun to play the game of “who will be the next Pope?”  This game usually ends in a surprise no one saw coming but this does not stop people from trying over and over again.  Some have speculated , as they did in 2005 right after the death of Pope John Paul II’s death, that there will be an African or Latin American Pope.  Some even go as far to say there could be the “first black Pope in 1,500 years.”

I decided to study and map out popes born outside of Europe.  There were some surprises among the results.

View Map of Non-European Popes in a larger map

Of the 265 officially recognized Popes, 217 have been Italian while 17 were French and 13 were Greek (though this includes ethnic and cultural Greeks who were from Greek Italy and Greek Asia).  So to solve problems like this I declared a non-European pope to be one who was born outside the modern understanding of what is Europe, regardless of ethnicity or culture.

Three Popes were born in Roman Africa, which today is part of Algeria, Tunisia, and Libya.  These African popes were Pope Victor I (189-199), Pope Miltiades (311 to 314), and Pope Gelasius I (492 to 496).  These Popes are sometimes described as Black in today’s press because of their African origin.  However, the elite in these provinces were descendants of Italian Romans while the population in rural areas were Berbers, who are an olive hue.  There is no comparably or historic evidence that the African popes were Black.

Two popes, both ethnically Greek, were born in modern day Turkey.  Pope John V (685-686) was from Antioch and Pope John VI was from Ephesus (701-705).  John V is sometimes considered “Syrian” due to Antioch’s location in Byzantine Syria.

Four popes were born in “Syria”, modern-day Syria and maybe Lebanon.  These are Popes Anicetus (150 to 167), Sisinnius (708), Constantine (708-715), and Gregory III (731-741).  Anicetus was born in modern day Homs, site of heavy fighting in the on-going civil war, while the other three were born in newly Muslim conquered Syria.  This shows that Christian intellectual thought and leadership were not crushed right away by the new Muslim rulers as pointed out in The Lost History of Christianity: The Thousand-Year Golden Age of the Church in the Middle East, Africa, and Asia and How It Died.

Two popes were born in modern day Israel, depending on who one asks.  Saint Peter, the first Pope, was born in the village of Bethsaida along the Sea of Galilee while Pope Theodore I (642-649) was an ethnic Greek from Jerusalem.  However, Bethsaida is east of the Jordan River in the Golan Heights region.  This is Israel or Syria on depending one’s perspective.  Meanwhile, the historic part of Jerusalem where Pope Theodore I was from is mostly likely in the part of the city east of the 1949 cease fire line and therefore either Israel or the West Bank.

So of the eleven popes born outside Europe, at least two were of ethnically non-European origin: Peter (Jewish) and Constantine (Assyrian).  Up to three more, the Africans, may have been Berber.  So between 0.75% to 1.88% of all Popes were of non-European ethnicity.

Some of these Popes played major roles while pontiff.  Pope Theodore I worked hard and proved Roman supremacy over the Emperor and Patriarch in Constantinople.  Meanwhile Pope Victor I was the pope who changed the language of the Roman Church from Greek to Latin.  Without his change traditionalist Catholics would be lamenting the loss of Greek in today’s liturgies.

Soon the Vatican will announce there is a new Pope.  No one yet knows who that person will be and where they will be from.  However, now you have a better understanding of the history of non-European popes.

Update: The Geography of the Papacy Since 2013

On March 13, 2013, Jorge Mario Bergoglio of Buenos Aires was elected Pope Francis, becoming the first pope from the Americas. Under the geographic definition used in this article, his election brought the historical number of popes born outside Europe to twelve.

Pope Francis served until his death on April 21, 2025. On May 8, 2025, Robert Francis Prevost, born in Chicago, was elected Pope Leo XIV. He became the first pope born in the United States. Using the same geographic definition, Leo XIV brought the historical total of popes born outside Europe to thirteen.

Operation Pillar of Cloud Israel-Gaza War Map: One – Extended Hamas Rocket Threat Range

0

Originally published November 16, 2012 — restored with updated historical context.

Several days before this article was originally published, I found an Israel Defense Forces infographic showing the estimated ranges of rockets available to Hamas. According to the map available at the time, the most advanced rocket shown was an upgraded Grad rocket with a range of approximately 48 kilometers (30 miles).

However, during the November 2012 Israel-Gaza conflict, known in Israel as Operation Pillar of Defense, rockets demonstrated a considerably greater range. Rockets were fired toward Tel Aviv, approximately 60 kilometers (37 miles) away, and toward Jerusalem, approximately 70 kilometers (44 miles) away.

This represented an important geographic change in the rocket threat. Areas of Israel that had previously been outside the expected range of rockets from Gaza were now potentially exposed.

Mapping the Extended Rocket Range

The map accompanying the original Geographic Travels article was created by the author. I added an additional buffer layer showing the newly demonstrated 70-kilometer range.

The original map was also made available as a Google Earth download. Because the original Google Earth forum resource is no longer reliably available at its old location, the archived version is preserved here as a historical reference.

Extending the buffer from 48 kilometers to approximately 70 kilometers dramatically increased the amount of Israeli territory and population potentially within rocket range. In geographic terms, reaching the Tel Aviv and Jerusalem areas represented a significant expansion compared with the shorter-range rockets that had previously characterized much of the threat from Gaza.

The original analysis also noted that Israel’s nuclear facility near Dimona remained more than 10 kilometers (6 miles) beyond the 70-kilometer range represented on the map at that time.

Historical Context

This map should be understood as a snapshot of rocket capabilities observed during the 2012 conflict, rather than a representation of present-day rocket ranges. Rocket capabilities in the Israel-Gaza conflict changed substantially in the years following the original publication of this article.

The geographic significance of the November 2012 development was straightforward: longer-range rockets meant that the potential threat area was no longer concentrated primarily around communities relatively close to Gaza. Major population centers farther inside Israel could also be reached.

Historical note: This Geographic Travels article was originally published on November 16, 2012. It has been restored from the archived version while preserving its original map analysis, measurements, references, and observations. Additional context has been added to distinguish the historical 2012 rocket ranges from present-day capabilities.